<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rethinking website navigation design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://briancray.com/2009/06/07/rethinking-website-navigation-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://briancray.com/2009/06/07/rethinking-website-navigation-design/</link>
	<description>User Experience Design, Web Development, and Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 00:45:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Liam Dilley</title>
		<link>http://briancray.com/2009/06/07/rethinking-website-navigation-design/#comment-32155</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam Dilley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancray.com/?p=625#comment-32155</guid>
		<description>Site Navigation for me:

1. The site Should not be made to fit the Navigation you want to use.

2. Navigation should always be custom to the site/web application it is being used in.

3. In saying 2 it also needs to be obvious and easy to use and there when needed. (Showing all links is not needed, go into an aspect of the site and more links etc are shown)

With 3, the most common thing at the moment is using the same navigation as a site/ web application that does the same things and because most people do this familiarity is created.
This causes an issue because this is not necessarily the right thing? Designers are reducing innovation? 
Take Basecamp from 37 signals, A lot of other web applications now use the same layout as them and people see this as the norm.
It is not wrong, but I do think innovation is hampered. The problem is if you create a unique navigation even when it works, people find it hard to use at first because it is different from what they expect. It could be better but people are off put by this.

SO...

Your stuck really. 

- Design something that is unique for what you are making it for which works and very clever BUT then has a learning curve which puts off a lot of users.
This could be the norm and everyone loving it at some point but do you take that risk? Try to get your client to agree on this could be a challenge.

- Find examples of similar sites/systems and use what you need to create a navigation someone can relate to easily BUT not necessary fitting what you have created.
Creating yet another &quot;copy&quot; a good thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Site Navigation for me:</p>
<p>1. The site Should not be made to fit the Navigation you want to use.</p>
<p>2. Navigation should always be custom to the site/web application it is being used in.</p>
<p>3. In saying 2 it also needs to be obvious and easy to use and there when needed. (Showing all links is not needed, go into an aspect of the site and more links etc are shown)</p>
<p>With 3, the most common thing at the moment is using the same navigation as a site/ web application that does the same things and because most people do this familiarity is created.<br />
This causes an issue because this is not necessarily the right thing? Designers are reducing innovation?<br />
Take Basecamp from 37 signals, A lot of other web applications now use the same layout as them and people see this as the norm.<br />
It is not wrong, but I do think innovation is hampered. The problem is if you create a unique navigation even when it works, people find it hard to use at first because it is different from what they expect. It could be better but people are off put by this.</p>
<p>SO&#8230;</p>
<p>Your stuck really. </p>
<p>- Design something that is unique for what you are making it for which works and very clever BUT then has a learning curve which puts off a lot of users.<br />
This could be the norm and everyone loving it at some point but do you take that risk? Try to get your client to agree on this could be a challenge.</p>
<p>- Find examples of similar sites/systems and use what you need to create a navigation someone can relate to easily BUT not necessary fitting what you have created.<br />
Creating yet another &#8220;copy&#8221; a good thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan-Marten de Boer</title>
		<link>http://briancray.com/2009/06/07/rethinking-website-navigation-design/#comment-32153</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan-Marten de Boer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancray.com/?p=625#comment-32153</guid>
		<description>The most awesome thing is that he somewhat fixed the whole issue while i was writing my complaint &gt;&lt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most awesome thing is that he somewhat fixed the whole issue while i was writing my complaint &gt;&lt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan-Marten de Boer</title>
		<link>http://briancray.com/2009/06/07/rethinking-website-navigation-design/#comment-32152</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan-Marten de Boer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancray.com/?p=625#comment-32152</guid>
		<description>@ Stuart Foster
Your site looks good, but i miss &quot;The big picture&quot;. You just dumped a bunch of social networking icons at the first place on a website your visitor is gonna check.. That&#039;s awfull thinking dude.. It&#039;s so nice, clean and well thought and then you throw out some icons you&#039;d rather get rid of then throw them to your visitors.. I wasn&#039;t excited within the golden &quot;3 seconds&quot; because i was trying to figure out what actuality was being described by the supposed expected te be &quot;hot topic picture&quot; which was just a bunch of icons... poor choice...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Stuart Foster<br />
Your site looks good, but i miss &#8220;The big picture&#8221;. You just dumped a bunch of social networking icons at the first place on a website your visitor is gonna check.. That&#8217;s awfull thinking dude.. It&#8217;s so nice, clean and well thought and then you throw out some icons you&#8217;d rather get rid of then throw them to your visitors.. I wasn&#8217;t excited within the golden &#8220;3 seconds&#8221; because i was trying to figure out what actuality was being described by the supposed expected te be &#8220;hot topic picture&#8221; which was just a bunch of icons&#8230; poor choice&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navigation types &#171; Lostneedle&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://briancray.com/2009/06/07/rethinking-website-navigation-design/#comment-31965</link>
		<dc:creator>Navigation types &#171; Lostneedle&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancray.com/?p=625#comment-31965</guid>
		<description>[...] http://briancray.com/2009/06/07/rethinking-website-navigation-design/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://briancray.com/2009/06/07/rethinking-website-navigation-design/" rel="nofollow">http://briancray.com/2009/06/07/rethinking-website-navigation-design/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry</title>
		<link>http://briancray.com/2009/06/07/rethinking-website-navigation-design/#comment-28801</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancray.com/?p=625#comment-28801</guid>
		<description>After reading your article, it somehow motivates me to get down on working on redesigning my company site. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading your article, it somehow motivates me to get down on working on redesigning my company site. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Designing Company</title>
		<link>http://briancray.com/2009/06/07/rethinking-website-navigation-design/#comment-28369</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Designing Company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 12:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancray.com/?p=625#comment-28369</guid>
		<description>Navigation of a website is very important in website designing. Nice points</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Navigation of a website is very important in website designing. Nice points</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yael Reinhardt-Matsliah</title>
		<link>http://briancray.com/2009/06/07/rethinking-website-navigation-design/#comment-27935</link>
		<dc:creator>Yael Reinhardt-Matsliah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancray.com/?p=625#comment-27935</guid>
		<description>oh, nevermind about the nav :) pretty silly question -- you&#039;re just using bread rumbs....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, nevermind about the nav <img src='http://briancray.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  pretty silly question &#8212; you&#8217;re just using bread rumbs&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yael Reinhardt-Matsliah</title>
		<link>http://briancray.com/2009/06/07/rethinking-website-navigation-design/#comment-27864</link>
		<dc:creator>Yael Reinhardt-Matsliah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancray.com/?p=625#comment-27864</guid>
		<description>This certainly gets the brain whizzing  --- navigation is such a &quot;standard&quot; part of design.

I&#039;m curious --- isn&#039;t the navigation you&#039;ve implemented a great example of what you are say about navigation?

I&#039;m also curious ---- how to you do the navigation thing on this site? Tells you where you are, then updates when you click a link in the content

Actually, your site design is a &quot;rethinking&quot; of web design period!

Thanks for activating the brain cellls :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This certainly gets the brain whizzing  &#8212; navigation is such a &#8220;standard&#8221; part of design.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious &#8212; isn&#8217;t the navigation you&#8217;ve implemented a great example of what you are say about navigation?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also curious &#8212;- how to you do the navigation thing on this site? Tells you where you are, then updates when you click a link in the content</p>
<p>Actually, your site design is a &#8220;rethinking&#8221; of web design period!</p>
<p>Thanks for activating the brain cellls <img src='http://briancray.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rebellawearsundies</title>
		<link>http://briancray.com/2009/06/07/rethinking-website-navigation-design/#comment-20636</link>
		<dc:creator>rebellawearsundies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancray.com/?p=625#comment-20636</guid>
		<description>What was the second?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was the second?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venny</title>
		<link>http://briancray.com/2009/06/07/rethinking-website-navigation-design/#comment-2457</link>
		<dc:creator>Venny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancray.com/?p=625#comment-2457</guid>
		<description>Brian, great post. Having designed umpteen-million nav schemes, the only thing I&#039;ve learned to be true is this: keep it simple. Don&#039;t get cutsie, especially with labeling. I think most of your points align with that... I particularly like &quot;...what the user wants to accomplish.&quot; I think there&#039;s a lot of room for improvement here. Thanks for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, great post. Having designed umpteen-million nav schemes, the only thing I&#8217;ve learned to be true is this: keep it simple. Don&#8217;t get cutsie, especially with labeling. I think most of your points align with that&#8230; I particularly like &#8220;&#8230;what the user wants to accomplish.&#8221; I think there&#8217;s a lot of room for improvement here. Thanks for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

