<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog design best practice: Scrollbars not sidebars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://briancray.com/2009/08/26/blog-design-information-overload-progressive-disclosure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://briancray.com/2009/08/26/blog-design-information-overload-progressive-disclosure/</link>
	<description>User Experience Design, Web Development, and Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: seTweaks</title>
		<link>http://briancray.com/2009/08/26/blog-design-information-overload-progressive-disclosure/#comment-32416</link>
		<dc:creator>seTweaks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 03:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancray.com/?p=1178#comment-32416</guid>
		<description>http://seTweaks.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://seTweaks.com" rel="nofollow">http://seTweaks.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giving credit where credit is due &#124; 812studio</title>
		<link>http://briancray.com/2009/08/26/blog-design-information-overload-progressive-disclosure/#comment-32345</link>
		<dc:creator>Giving credit where credit is due &#124; 812studio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 03:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancray.com/?p=1178#comment-32345</guid>
		<description>[...] Blog design best practice: Scrollbars not sidebars [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blog design best practice: Scrollbars not sidebars [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Cooper</title>
		<link>http://briancray.com/2009/08/26/blog-design-information-overload-progressive-disclosure/#comment-32226</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancray.com/?p=1178#comment-32226</guid>
		<description>A little confused by a couple of the suggestions in the comments above.. Watch Shock and Ollie Judge clearly have sidebars (spam?).. Watch Shock&#039;s has about 100 categories in it! I&#039;ll throw one of my faves into the fray though: http://rc3.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little confused by a couple of the suggestions in the comments above.. Watch Shock and Ollie Judge clearly have sidebars (spam?).. Watch Shock&#8217;s has about 100 categories in it! I&#8217;ll throw one of my faves into the fray though: <a href="http://rc3.org/" rel="nofollow">http://rc3.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Cooper</title>
		<link>http://briancray.com/2009/08/26/blog-design-information-overload-progressive-disclosure/#comment-32225</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancray.com/?p=1178#comment-32225</guid>
		<description>What about the fixed &quot;sidebar&quot; on the far right of this very page? ;-)

Anyway, I agree for the most part, but things like subscription options are important to most content creators (as they appear to be for you to have them fixed on the right) so while cutting the fat is a great idea, there are a few &quot;secondary&quot; things that are important enough to live above the fold on many sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the fixed &#8220;sidebar&#8221; on the far right of this very page? <img src='http://briancray.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Anyway, I agree for the most part, but things like subscription options are important to most content creators (as they appear to be for you to have them fixed on the right) so while cutting the fat is a great idea, there are a few &#8220;secondary&#8221; things that are important enough to live above the fold on many sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The more I know, the less I need: Thoughts on web design</title>
		<link>http://briancray.com/2009/08/26/blog-design-information-overload-progressive-disclosure/#comment-32008</link>
		<dc:creator>The more I know, the less I need: Thoughts on web design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancray.com/?p=1178#comment-32008</guid>
		<description>[...] learning may shock some of you, and it may confirm ideas for others. It&#8217;s not far from what I&#8217;ve blogged about in the past: Supplemental navigation is, in most cases, visual [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] learning may shock some of you, and it may confirm ideas for others. It&#8217;s not far from what I&#8217;ve blogged about in the past: Supplemental navigation is, in most cases, visual [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brad</title>
		<link>http://briancray.com/2009/08/26/blog-design-information-overload-progressive-disclosure/#comment-31990</link>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancray.com/?p=1178#comment-31990</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another great example...
http://diveintomark.org/

/b</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another great example&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://diveintomark.org/" rel="nofollow">http://diveintomark.org/</a></p>
<p>/b</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The more I know, the less I need: Thoughts on web design &#124; Trinity Marketing</title>
		<link>http://briancray.com/2009/08/26/blog-design-information-overload-progressive-disclosure/#comment-31918</link>
		<dc:creator>The more I know, the less I need: Thoughts on web design &#124; Trinity Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 09:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancray.com/?p=1178#comment-31918</guid>
		<description>[...] I’m learning may shock some of you, and it may confirm ideas for others. It’s not far from what I’ve blogged about in the past: Supplemental navigation is, in most cases, visual [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I’m learning may shock some of you, and it may confirm ideas for others. It’s not far from what I’ve blogged about in the past: Supplemental navigation is, in most cases, visual [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Olyslager</title>
		<link>http://briancray.com/2009/08/26/blog-design-information-overload-progressive-disclosure/#comment-28677</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Olyslager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancray.com/?p=1178#comment-28677</guid>
		<description>Always found it interesting when someone had a different opinion than the other 99%  :).  I do agree people scan the page in a linear way (vertically) and designing to that pattern is good... but i think that your &quot;breaking this eye pattern can be disruptive&quot;-comment is a bit too much :). I see it more as a little pause from reading further down. As long the reading process is consistant in any way and easy on the eye, it should be fine for the reader. 

I do agree with putting secondary information below the fold, but i do believe the primary information definatly should be on top of the fold. People need aprox. 8 to 12 seconds to decide if they find your information usefull or not... You don&#039;t have to overwelm them with all your information (this will create an aversion towards your website) but the most important should be visible right away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always found it interesting when someone had a different opinion than the other 99%  <img src='http://briancray.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .  I do agree people scan the page in a linear way (vertically) and designing to that pattern is good&#8230; but i think that your &#8220;breaking this eye pattern can be disruptive&#8221;-comment is a bit too much <img src='http://briancray.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> . I see it more as a little pause from reading further down. As long the reading process is consistant in any way and easy on the eye, it should be fine for the reader. </p>
<p>I do agree with putting secondary information below the fold, but i do believe the primary information definatly should be on top of the fold. People need aprox. 8 to 12 seconds to decide if they find your information usefull or not&#8230; You don&#8217;t have to overwelm them with all your information (this will create an aversion towards your website) but the most important should be visible right away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Cray</title>
		<link>http://briancray.com/2009/08/26/blog-design-information-overload-progressive-disclosure/#comment-28231</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Cray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancray.com/?p=1178#comment-28231</guid>
		<description>Brad: Great point! There is certainly a balance between form and function and I&#039;m always searching for that elusive balance! =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad: Great point! There is certainly a balance between form and function and I&#8217;m always searching for that elusive balance! =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://briancray.com/2009/08/26/blog-design-information-overload-progressive-disclosure/#comment-28187</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancray.com/?p=1178#comment-28187</guid>
		<description>Brian,

Excellent post.

I was built a wordpress theme that worked and operated JUST like UseIt.com and it&#039;s coversion rates were amazing... way better than any 2 column or (yikes) 3 column sites out there.

The only problem was that people didn&#039;t have a good &quot;feeling&quot; about the site, even if it was highly usable.  I guess there is a gap between what people can use and what people like.  Finding that balance may be the key.

Brad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>Excellent post.</p>
<p>I was built a wordpress theme that worked and operated JUST like UseIt.com and it&#8217;s coversion rates were amazing&#8230; way better than any 2 column or (yikes) 3 column sites out there.</p>
<p>The only problem was that people didn&#8217;t have a good &#8220;feeling&#8221; about the site, even if it was highly usable.  I guess there is a gap between what people can use and what people like.  Finding that balance may be the key.</p>
<p>Brad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
